Wonkin' In Detroit Wonkin' In Detroit

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

The GM MPG Advertising Numbers Game

Ann Job has some biting words for General Motors' recent advertising "numbers game" on miles per gallon in today's Detroit News. GM has been trying recently to boost its environmental image and show that its vehicles are fuel-thrifty with advertising offering potential car buyers more vehicles that get at least 30 mpg in highway driving than any other carmaker.

Job points out that that should be pretty easy for GM considering the fact that they have more model offerings than anybody else -- some 65 GM nameplates sold last year in the United States alone. But that means they only have 29% of their vehicles rated at 30 mpg or higher. By using this same logic, Toyota can claim that 55% of their offerings, or 15 models, get an EPA rating of at least 30 mpg on the highway. Honda can claim 60%. Hmm...maybe GM needs to be careful with how they are spinning their numbers, because they just might find out that Toyota and Honda can play that numbers game too...and in all honesty, despite Bluewater Network's protests to the contrary...they are definetly better situated to do so.

But it'a not just Job needling the General over their innovative use of numbers in advertising. The Sierra Club has joined in on the fun. They are pointing out the fact that GM is using the highway mpg numbers...not the combined city/highway numbers which are more realistic. In fact, they even have a site set up to tell folks the "true" mpg of the "30 and up crowd" advertisement (pictured to the left). They also have a "Green Quiz" up on their site as well.

You know, I'm glad to see organizations holding GM's feet to the flames on this. GM has been throwing around these numbers claiming their superiority on the environmental front, and it really is just bunk. GM has spent the past...century...building cars that drink gas like a wino drinks Franzia. If GM really wants to bank environmental cred, they need to start providing cars that give them the benjies to bank...and not try to play the numbers.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Micah said...

I remember that whole riverwalk post...it seems like GM spends so much time trying to PRETEND like they are pro-environment...and so little time actually BEING pro-environment.

10:45 AM, January 25, 2006  
Anonymous John said...

In defence of GM, I'm a loyal buyer and would never be a traitor and purchase any other brand no matter where it's from... No company is perfect nor are it's employees. BTW, my family sells GM cars and trucks....

Your point is valid, but the larger issue here are the people who choose to buy foreign cars and trucks. That's they're business of course but if you enjoy the benefits of living in this country, you should purchase American built vehicals.Just my .02 cents worth.

11:16 AM, January 25, 2006  
Anonymous starlightmica said...

you should purchase American built vehicals.Just my .02 cents worth.

No Chevy Equinox/Pontiac Torrent, Buick LaCrosse, Pontiac Grand Prix, Chevrolet Monte Carlo, now-discontinued Chevy Camaro/Pontiac Firebird, on your shopping or rental list. All built in Canada, not the 51st state last time I checked. Also, no Pontiac Sunfire, Pontiac GTO, Chevy Aveo, built in Mexico, Australia, and Korea.

1:18 PM, January 25, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

John,

I think GM is now making cars that look "nice". The Pontiac Pursuit (Canada only!!) looks quite good in either sedan or coupe trim.

GM has 3 cars in the Chevy brand that I just don't understand... Aveo (no where near the fuel mileage of an Echo/Yaris!!, NO WHERE!!, Hyundai Accent is better!) Epica, and Optra.. All 3 are made in Korea by Daewoo. Then you have Cobalt, then it moves up from there. Four cars that compete with each other in the small car segment, THEN you can throw in the Pontiac Wave and Pursuit... ok.. That 2.2 Ecotec isn't that great on fuel. I drove a Pontiac Vibe that has a 1.8L engine that felt better.

I think in the first three years of ownership, you can't go wrong with a GM. However, after that, the resale value TANKS, and then you get expensive out of warranty repairs. Toyota.. just change the oil, brakes, and voila.. GM?!?! Brake problems (ABS sensors), electrics/electronics, paint delamination.... etc. etc..

I hope GM can save themselves. Better fuel mileage is one thing, but less emissions overall is another. Toyota has more vehicles with small engines than GM. That's the bottom line. And Toyota's small engines put out GOOD torque and power. Period.

10:02 PM, January 25, 2006  
Blogger Mr Furious said...

The only one, according to Sierra Club, that combines to get over 30 mpg is really a Toyota (the Vibe).

Nice.

I was astounded the first time I saw how crappy the mileage for the Aveo is. Why buy that car and be in the 20s? Outrageous.

11:11 AM, August 28, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home